This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelinesThe phone interview does not require meeting face-to-face.
After the phone interview, you are asked to complete a test (an assignment?). Although this is a way to assess your work ability, I felt that the requirements were somewhat overly detailed and extensive. It inevitably also makes you worry that, if you are not hired, your proposal might be used. In addition, during the conversation, I noticed that the internal team seemed to have undergone a reorganization, although I do not know whether this was related to a high turnover rate.
1. The work is easygoing; no one monitors your progress, and no one helps plan it for you, so you can do whatever you want.
2. People who proactively point out problems at the company usually don’t stay long, so there’s no need to worry about getting caught slacking off.
3. The Chief Product Officer is often sick and likes working remotely, so this place is actually quite suitable for people in poor health or those looking for a low-effort job.
1. The company’s direction is indecisive.
2. Communication between departments is poor.
3. When the Chief Product Officer can’t plan a good product, they have the technical team implement it first and then blame the technical or design teams.
There are mental health days and flexible working hours, suitable for people who are not passionate about their work
The company’s direction is constantly unclear, and organizational communication is not transparent
The head of product seems not to know what they are doing. When the direction is unclear, they simply tell the technical team to execute. If you raise potential issues, they will dislike you, but you still have to carry it out
The interview follow-up was very quick!
The company has an industrial-style environment, and the entrance is somewhat dim.
The position I interviewed for seemed to require someone with extensive experience who could contribute practical expertise.