Mr. Hsieh, a reporter at Huìliú, the news article you published on August 11 last year concerns a case that was already closed. I do not understand why you keep publishing it.

As a reporter, don't you know that the other party can file criminal charges against you (for defamation)? What is your motive for continuing to publish a report about a case that has already been closed—are you trying to maintain your presence, or can you no longer find other social news to publish? The other party has already been questioned through their lawyer at the Shenkeng Police Station. You have still not taken down the report about the closed case, causing trouble for the other party's work. I hope you will speak with your friend. I believe your Mr. Liao has also received the judgment. Please confirm this with him and take down the report; otherwise, the other party may file a lawsuit against you.

It is not worthwhile for both of you to keep going to court over a case that has already been closed. If you think you have plenty of time, I have nothing more to say. So please ask your Mr. Liao whether he has received the judgment. The case is over. As journalists, you cannot simply assume that once something is published, you have no further responsibility, because you, Mr. Hsieh, were the person who published it. You are still publishing a social-news report from last year even though the case was already closed, and this has affected the other party's right to work. This also constitutes harm. I believe that, as journalists, you must understand the law better than ordinary people like us. That is all I have to say; I hope you can promptly take down this social-news report from July 11 last year.