Workplace reviews and discussion: 格蘭英語_格蘭事業股份有限公司

None

Many.

The interview process is divided into three parts:

The first part is an aptitude and logic test, along with filling in basic information.

The second part is an interview with the department manager: Throughout the interview, the department manager did not mention the company or the position being interviewed for at all; instead, they kept asking the candidate to talk about their educational and work experience. They also repeatedly interrupted the candidate while they were speaking, making the candidate feel disrespected.

Of course, candidates should do their homework before attending an interview, but there is a lot of information that cannot be found through job banks or websites, right? Isn’t it also necessary to provide an appropriate introduction? Is the job content really limited to what is listed on the job bank?

Before fully explaining the responsibilities of the position, they kept asking what the candidate could bring to the company. Why not first explain what qualities are needed for this position?

The third stage is an interview with the boss: They asked detailed questions about the reasons for each time the candidate had changed jobs, and did so in a very humiliating manner, for example: “Was it because you lacked the ability and were forced to leave?” and “Or was it because you didn’t put in enough effort, which led to this result?”

Everyone has their own strengths. Is there really a need to humiliate people like this? If you are all so capable, why do you still need to hire people?

Is it really that difficult to respect every candidate?