None
The company culture and way of working are both extremely poor and very inefficient. Don’t assume you’ll learn anything by joining; although it appears to be a foreign company on the surface, its culture and way of working are extremely traditional. It is simply a place that wastes your career and life and makes you feel unhappy.
Moreover, when the company asks employees to leave and is asked to list specific serious violations or reasons for unsuitability, it cannot provide any at all, only saying that the person is simply unsuitable. This is extremely unreasonable, so under no circumstances should you give up your current job or other employment opportunities to come here.
None
- Have experienced delayed salary payments on national holidays / monthly salary payments being issued in less than 30 days, more than once
- Personnel changes are announced every few weeks, and the number of people affected each time is considerable, leaving employees at a loss
- Announcements frequently repeat the penalty clauses in employment contracts, creating conflict and tension between labor and management
- The worst administrative and personnel management I have seen in my career
- They make a big show of evaluating employee performance, but there is no year-end bonus at all
- Extremely high turnover
None
After all that effort,
turns out the problem was stuck on someone.
Please refer to the December 2018 post.
On the road to finding a job, you will always encounter companies like this. I hope everyone won't waste time and finds their ideal job.
Ms. Tseng was finally driven out. Does anyone know why she was driven out? Can someone share?
What other outrageous things did Ms. Tseng do? Toward the National Palace Museum? Toward vendors? Toward employees?
Based on the many reviews on this site, I verified the hiring manager’s hypocritical true nature one point at a time.
The impression given by the website differs greatly from the company’s actual culture. It presents itself as a foreign company but is actually local, and is worse than many local companies. The facilities in the cramped meeting room resemble a visit to a backward country.
The company’s benefits system is unclear, and it cannot explain the details. It demands that employees work like oxen and be all-rounders, while squeezing their salaries and even imposing requirements on employees’ appearance. Is this a beauty pageant? Why not look in the mirror first?
The hiring manager has poor emotional control and is thin-skinned, unable to accept straightforward honesty. As soon as someone exposes her game, she throws a fit. She seems articulate, but in fact everything she says is nonsense. She exercises unchecked power, and the overseas managers are completely manipulated by her. Every day, she schemes constantly to protect her own power. She never stops mentioning her experience as a senior executive at a multinational company, but in reality she is narrow-minded and uses dirty tactics. She repeatedly claims that this is a cultural enterprise, but all I saw was the dark side of human nature.
Her reputation in her former industry was poor. Although she was clearly an Asia-region account manager, she called herself the general manager of Taiwan. She was consumed by a desire for power. The National Palace Museum contract was worth nearly 100 million over three years, and the company’s largest annual expense was a salary of 2.5 million for someone who performed terribly, was not the general manager, yet called herself the general manager. No wonder the company saves on everything except her salary. Unable to find anyone else, she did the work herself, which was merely adequate. She claims that the National Palace Museum client is difficult to deal with; at least they are smart. In fact, the most difficult and low-class person is the individual herself.
Is there any?
Someone named Lu Jian even tricked me into going to two interviews.
The supervisors in black uniforms will voluntarily lend a hand.
The colleagues get along very well.
1. The uniforms are very ugly.
2. They say the probationary period is three months, but some people work for a year before passing probation, and they won’t tell you why you didn’t pass.
3. There is no year-end bonus. No matter how long you work there, the salary remains the same. During the interview, they even lied and said there would be an annual raise.
4. People who don’t know how to do their work never have to learn anything new, while those who can do the work are worked to the bone, yet everyone gets paid the same.
5. When they can’t hire engineers, they make employees learn and do the engineers’ work; when they can’t afford to hire translators, they make employees translate.
6. As if the uniforms weren’t ugly enough, they also require you to wear your hair up, prohibit earrings, and prohibit nail polish.
7. I don’t even know whether they can still sign a contract with the National Palace Museum for the following year.
None
There are none
Absolutely none
I was the one person who refused to believe it,
thinking that the people who had discussed it before were only telling one side of the story.
As it turned out, the interview process was indeed exactly as described in those discussions:
1. Rescheduling (changing the time for no apparent reason)
2. Requesting additional information (asking you to provide past records for reference)
3. And then, nothing—no notifications, no updates, nothing at all
The person conducting the interview was the author of the book.
It seemed that the office shared the same space with another company.
You entered through a small door on the right.
Then came the interview.
As people on the forum had said, they did not explain what the job involved.
Instead, they asked you to describe what you could do for the position.
Honestly, I couldn't tell whether the other person wanted to conduct an interview or just chat.
Job hunting is not easy to begin with.
If you can find a better job,
why would you come to this company, which has 100% negative reviews?
Because you want to give yourself a chance.
Perhaps some people will still see this
and decide to give themselves a chance.
After all, opportunities have to be fought for.
But believe me,
you should not have to settle like this for a job,
especially when the other party does not value you either.
You can imagine what the future would be like.
The receptionist was very nice.
The interview time kept being changed, and I was ultimately stood up. They kept asking for more and more documents—I have no idea what for.
I was going to say that the staff were friendly and courteous, but the supervisor being late and disrespecting the interviewee’s time canceled that out.
The supervisor was late and did not respect other people’s time; the job responsibilities were unclear. They said they hoped employees would not think they could leave as soon as they had finished their own tasks, but should help one another.
None
It would be quicker to simply replace the female manager.
None
A position I was just driven out of. If you can work day and night and withstand being bombarded by LINE messages 24 hours a day, then go for it. Don’t say I didn’t warn you—the supervisor is an extremely abnormal woman who even has opinions about how things should be arranged on the desk. If you have a strong enough heart, you can give it a try. If you’re not afraid of being harassed and bullied every day, go ahead.