No pros
A certain supervisor in Team 1 will casually fire employees
Has money to build new factory buildings, buy shareholders’ land, and purchase the company’s treasury shares. Has money to give year-end bonuses to employees of the loss-making parent company, while employees of the loss-making subsidiary get nothing. This double standard is truly lacking in X ethics.
Don’t..., even if you’re forced to.
They have money to build new factory buildings, money to buy shareholders’ land, and money to purchase the company’s treasury stock. They have money to give year-end bonuses to employees of the loss-making parent company, while employees of the loss-making subsidiary get nothing. Such blatant favoritism is truly lacking in X virtue.
Don’t..., even if you have no other choice.
Has money to build a new factory, buy shareholders’ land, and purchase the company’s treasury stock. Has money to give year-end bonuses to employees of the loss-making parent company, while employees of the loss-making subsidiary get nothing. This favoritism is really unethical.
Don’t..., even if you have no choice.
Has money to build new factory buildings, buy shareholders’ land, and purchase the company’s treasury shares. Has money to pay year-end bonuses to employees of the loss-making parent company, while employees of the loss-making subsidiary get nothing. Such blatant favoritism is truly lacking in X-virtue.
Don’t..., even if you’re forced to.
Has money to build new factories, buy shareholders’ land, and purchase the company’s treasury stock. Has money to give year-end bonuses to employees of the loss-making parent company, while employees of the loss-making subsidiary get nothing. This double standard is really lacking in [expletive] ethics.
Don’t... even if you have no choice.
Has money to build new factory buildings, buy shareholders’ land, and purchase the company’s treasury stock. Has money to give year-end bonuses to employees of the loss-making parent company, while employees of the loss-making subsidiary get nothing. This blatant favoritism is really lacking in X-virtue.
Don’t..., even if you’re forced to.
Has money to build new factory buildings, buy shareholders’ land, and purchase the company’s treasury stock. Has money to pay year-end bonuses to employees of the loss-making parent company, while employees of the loss-making subsidiary get nothing. This blatant favoritism is truly lacking in X-virtue.
Don’t... even if you have no other choice.
There’s money to build new factory buildings, money to buy shareholders’ land, and money to purchase the company’s treasury stock. There’s money to give year-end bonuses to employees of the loss-making parent company, while employees of the loss-making subsidiary get nothing. Such blatant favoritism is really lacking in X-ethics.
Don’t..., even if you have no choice.
Has money to build new factory buildings, buy shareholders’ land, and purchase the company’s treasury shares. Has money to give year-end bonuses to employees of the loss-making parent company, while employees of the loss-making subsidiary get nothing. This blatant double standard is truly lacking in X-ethics.
Don’t..., even if you’re forced to.
Has money to build new factory buildings, buy land from shareholders, and purchase the company's treasury shares. Has money to give year-end bonuses to employees of the loss-making parent company, while employees of the loss-making subsidiary get nothing. Such blatant favoritism is really lacking in X-virtue.
Don't ..., even if you're forced to.
There’s money to build a new factory, money to buy land from shareholders, and money to repurchase the company’s treasury stock. There’s money to pay year-end bonuses to employees of the loss-making parent company, while employees of the loss-making subsidiary get nothing. This double standard is really lacking in X-virtue.
Don’t..., even if you have no other choice.
Money to build new factories, money to buy shareholders’ land, money to purchase the company’s treasury stock. Money to pay year-end bonuses to employees of the loss-making parent company, while employees of the loss-making subsidiary get nothing. This blatant favoritism is really devoid of X virtue.
Don’t..., even if you have no choice.
They have money to build new factories, money to buy shareholders’ land, and money to purchase the company’s treasury stock. They have money to pay year-end bonuses to employees of the loss-making parent company, while employees of the loss-making subsidiary get nothing. Such blatant favoritism is truly lacking in X-ethics.
Don’t..., even if you have no other choice.
Has money to build new factory buildings, has money to buy shareholders’ land, and has money to purchase the company’s treasury stock. Has money to give year-end bonuses to employees of the loss-making parent company, while employees of the loss-making subsidiary get nothing. Such blatant favoritism is really unethical.
Don’t XX, even if you’re forced to.
Has money to build new factories, money to buy shareholders’ land, and money to purchase the company’s treasury stock. Has money to pay year-end bonuses to employees of the loss-making parent company, while employees of the loss-making subsidiary get nothing. This kind of favoritism really shows no X virtue.
Don’t XX, even if you’re forced to.
Has money to build new factory buildings, has money to buy shareholders’ land, and has money to purchase the company’s treasury stock. Has money to pay year-end bonuses to employees of the loss-making parent company, while employees of the loss-making subsidiary get none. Such blatant favoritism is really lacking in X virtue.
Don’t XX, even if you have no other choice.
Has money to build new factory buildings, buy shareholders’ land, and purchase the company’s treasury stock. Has money to give year-end bonuses to employees of the loss-making parent company, while employees of the loss-making subsidiary get nothing. This double standard is truly lacking in X-ethics.
Don’t XX, even if you’re forced to.
Has money to build new factory buildings, buy shareholders’ land, and purchase the company’s treasury stock. Has money to give year-end bonuses to employees of the loss-making parent company, while employees of the loss-making subsidiary get nothing. This favoritism really shows no X-virtue.
Don’t XX, even if you have no other choice.
Has money to build new factories, buy shareholders’ land, and purchase the company’s treasury stock. Has money to give year-end bonuses to employees of the loss-making parent company, while employees of the loss-making subsidiary get nothing. This blatant favoritism is truly lacking in X ethics.
Don’t XX, even if it’s absolutely unavoidable.
Has money to build new factory buildings, money to buy shareholders’ land, and money to purchase the company’s treasury stock. Has money to give year-end bonuses to employees of the loss-making parent company, while employees of the loss-making subsidiary get nothing. This kind of favoritism is really lacking in X virtue.
Don’t XX, even if you have no other choice.
Has money to build new factory buildings, buy shareholders’ land, and purchase the company’s treasury stock. Has money to give year-end bonuses to employees of the loss-making parent company, while employees of the loss-making subsidiary get nothing. This favoritism really shows no X-ethics at all.
Don’t XX, even if you’re forced to.